Skip to main content

AI Wrote My Code, I Skipped Testing… Guess What Happened?

AI is a fantastic tool for coding—until it isn't. It promises to save time, automate tasks, and help developers move faster. But if you trust it too much, you might just end up doing extra work instead of less.


How do I know? Because the other day, I did exactly that.




The Day AI Made Me File My Own Bug


I was working on a personal project, feeling pretty good about my progress, when I asked AI to generate some code. It looked solid—clean, well-structured, and exactly what I needed. So, in a moment of blind optimism, I deployed it without testing locally first.


You can probably guess what happened next.


Five minutes later, I was filing my own bug report, debugging like a madman, and fixing issues on a separate branch. After some trial and error (and a few choice words), I finally did what I should have done in the first place: tested the code locally first. Only after confirming it actually worked did I roll out the fix.


Sound familiar? If you've ever used AI-generated code, I bet you've had a similar experience.


AI is a Great Assistant—But a Terrible Boss


As much as AI can speed up development, it shouldn't replace human judgment. Here's why blindly trusting it can backfire:


1. AI Writes Code Like a Confident Liar


It sounds right, looks right, and is completely wrong. AI doesn't truly understand the code—it just predicts what looks correct based on patterns. Sometimes, those patterns lead to nonsense.


2. Debugging an AI's Mistakes is Still Your Job


If AI writes bad code, guess who's fixing it? You. And if you didn't test it properly before deploying, now you're fixing it in production. (Ask me how I know.)


3. AI Assumes Everything Works on the First Try (LOL)


It doesn't account for edge cases, unexpected inputs, or your specific project setup. If you don't test it, you'll find out the hard way that it breaks under real-world conditions.


Lessons Learned (So You Don't Make the Same Mistake)


Here's what I should have done, and what you should too:

Always test AI-generated code locally first. No exceptions. Trust, but verify.

Read through the code before running it. Make sure it actually makes sense for your project.

Use AI as an assistant, not a replacement for thinking. AI speeds up the process, but you're still responsible for the final result.


Final Thoughts: Learn From My Pain


AI can make development faster and easier—if you use it wisely. But if you trust it blindly, you'll end up like me, debugging your own mistake at midnight.


So, let my experience be your cautionary tale: always test first, deploy second. Otherwise, you might just find yourself filing your own bug report, wondering how it all went wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLP Test Generation: "Write Tests Like You Text Your Mom"

Picture this: You're sipping coffee, dreading writing test cases. Suddenly, your QA buddy says, "You know you can just tell the AI what to do now, right?" You're like, "Wait… I can literally write: 👉 Click the login button 👉 Enter email and password 👉 Expect to see dashboard " And the AI's like, "Say less. I got you." 💥 BOOM. Test script = done. Welcome to the magical world of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Test Generation , where you talk like a human and your tests are coded like a pro. 🤖 What is NLP Test Generation? NLP Test Generation lets you describe tests in plain English (or whatever language you think in before caffeine), and the AI converts them into executable test scripts. So instead of writing: await page. click ( '#login-button' ); You write: Click the login button. And the AI translates it like your polyglot coworker who speaks JavaScript, Python, and sarcasm. 🛠️ Tools That ...

Flaky Test Detection in AI-Based QA: When Machine Learning Gets a Nose for Drama

You know that one test in your suite? The one that passes on Mondays but fails every third Thursday if Mercury's in retrograde? Yeah, that's a flaky test. Flaky tests are the drama queens of QA. They show up, cause a scene, and leave you wondering if the bug was real or just performance art. Enter: AI-based QA with flaky test detection powered by machine learning. AKA: the cool, data-driven therapist who helps your tests get their act together. 🥐 What Are Flaky Tests? In technical terms: flaky tests are those that produce inconsistent results without any changes in the codebase. In human terms: they're the "it's not you, it's me" of your test suite. 🕵️‍♂️ How AI & ML Sniff Out the Flakes Machine Learning models can be trained to: Track patterns in test pass/fail history. Correlate failures with external signals (e.g., network delays, timing issues, thread contention). Cluster similar failures to spot root causes. La...

Test Case Prioritization with AI: Because Who Has Time to Test Everything?

Let's be real. Running all the tests, every time, sounds like a great idea… until you realize your test suite takes longer than the Lord of the Rings Extended Trilogy. Enter AI-based test case prioritization. It's like your test suite got a personal assistant who whispers, "Psst, you might wanna run these tests first. The rest? Meh, later." 🧠 What's the Deal? AI scans your codebase and thinks, "Okay, what just changed? What's risky? What part of the app do users abuse the most?" Then it ranks test cases like it's organizing a party guest list: VIPs (Run these first) : High-risk, recently impacted, or high-traffic areas. Maybe Later (Run if you have time) : Tests that haven't changed in years or cover rarely used features (looking at you, "Export to XML" button). Back of the Line (Run before retirement) : That one test no one knows what it does but no one dares delete. 🧰 Tools That Can Do This M...