How AI Turned Me into a Playwright Wizard (Overnight and Without a Clue)

Once upon a time, in a land filled with legacy test frameworks and stale documentation, a brave automation tester (me) decided to embark on an epic quest: Setting up Playwright.

Did I have experience with Playwright? Nope.
Did I care? Also nope.
Did I have AI by my side? Absolutely.

Why Even Try?

Look, as an automation tester, I tend to stick with what works. I mean, if a tool runs my tests, why mess with it? But every now and then, an opportunity arises to experiment with something new—whether out of necessity, curiosity, or sheer boredom. This time, Playwright caught my attention, and with AI as my trusty sidekick, I was off to the races.

Step 1: Let AI Do the Heavy Lifting

Back in the olden days (aka pre-AI times), setting up a test automation framework meant:
☠️ Digging through outdated documentation
💀 Copy-pasting error messages into Google
⚰️ Watching my soul leave my body as I debugged for hours

But this time? I outsourced my brainpower to AI.

Here’s what I asked it to do:
✅ Generate Gherkin tests to perform basic site navigation.
✅ Spit out a Playwright test script (because why do it myself?).
✅ Give me step-by-step setup instructions for Playwright on a Mac using VS Code.
✅ Explain how to integrate GitHub and GitHub Actions because I enjoy pushing buttons and watching things work.

I didn’t even lift a finger—except to copy-paste AI’s glorious wisdom into my terminal.

Step 2: Reality Check—Tests Don’t Pass Themselves

Within minutes, I had Playwright installed, tests written, and GitHub ready to go. Then, I ran my first test.

🚨 Immediate Failure. 🚨

Ah, yes. The “real work” part of automation.

Turns out, AI may be fast, but it’s not perfect (yet). So I rolled up my sleeves, fixed some test selectors, and before long... BOOM! Tests passed locally.

Step 3: Automate Everything & Feel Like a Genius

With local tests working, I pushed everything to GitHub. Thanks to AI’s guidance, I even wired up GitHub Actions to run the tests in the cloud—so now my tests run automatically without me lifting a finger. (Truly, the dream.)

Final Thoughts (Or: Why AI Is My New Best Friend)

Setting up Playwright manually? Days of effort.
Setting it up with AI? Less than a day.
Feeling like a wizard because tests magically run? Priceless.

Moral of the story? AI won’t replace automation testers, but it will make us lazier—er, I mean, more efficient. The only question is: How fast can you let AI do the boring stuff so you can focus on the fun part?

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have more AI-generated sorcery to explore. ✨

Comments

NLP Test Generation: "Write Tests Like You Text Your Mom"

Picture this: You're sipping coffee, dreading writing test cases. Suddenly, your QA buddy says, "You know you can just tell the AI what to do now, right?" You're like, "Wait… I can literally write: 👉 Click the login button 👉 Enter email and password 👉 Expect to see dashboard " And the AI's like, "Say less. I got you." 💥 BOOM. Test script = done. Welcome to the magical world of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Test Generation , where you talk like a human and your tests are coded like a pro. 🤖 What is NLP Test Generation? NLP Test Generation lets you describe tests in plain English (or whatever language you think in before caffeine), and the AI converts them into executable test scripts. So instead of writing: await page. click ( '#login-button' ); You write: Click the login button. And the AI translates it like your polyglot coworker who speaks JavaScript, Python, and sarcasm. 🛠️ Tools That ...

Test Case Prioritization with AI: Because Who Has Time to Test Everything?

Let's be real. Running all the tests, every time, sounds like a great idea… until you realize your test suite takes longer than the Lord of the Rings Extended Trilogy. Enter AI-based test case prioritization. It's like your test suite got a personal assistant who whispers, "Psst, you might wanna run these tests first. The rest? Meh, later." 🧠 What's the Deal? AI scans your codebase and thinks, "Okay, what just changed? What's risky? What part of the app do users abuse the most?" Then it ranks test cases like it's organizing a party guest list: VIPs (Run these first) : High-risk, recently impacted, or high-traffic areas. Maybe Later (Run if you have time) : Tests that haven't changed in years or cover rarely used features (looking at you, "Export to XML" button). Back of the Line (Run before retirement) : That one test no one knows what it does but no one dares delete. 🧰 Tools That Can Do This M...

Flaky Test Detection in AI-Based QA: When Machine Learning Gets a Nose for Drama

You know that one test in your suite? The one that passes on Mondays but fails every third Thursday if Mercury's in retrograde? Yeah, that's a flaky test. Flaky tests are the drama queens of QA. They show up, cause a scene, and leave you wondering if the bug was real or just performance art. Enter: AI-based QA with flaky test detection powered by machine learning. AKA: the cool, data-driven therapist who helps your tests get their act together. 🥐 What Are Flaky Tests? In technical terms: flaky tests are those that produce inconsistent results without any changes in the codebase. In human terms: they're the "it's not you, it's me" of your test suite. 🕵️‍♂️ How AI & ML Sniff Out the Flakes Machine Learning models can be trained to: Track patterns in test pass/fail history. Correlate failures with external signals (e.g., network delays, timing issues, thread contention). Cluster similar failures to spot root causes. La...

Automation Insights 101

Search This Blog